D-04 · Aggregate fieldsarchive-recorded · snapshot 2026-09-17
Aggregate Fields: Multi-Tool Dossiers
The 25 aggregate dossiers rank multi-tool fields of 4–7 participants (128 participant slots in total). Each row shows the recorded ranking leader, runner-up and the published gap.
Key numbers
Aggregate dossiers
25
data/comparisons.json (mode=aggregate) · N=195
Participant slots
128
participants[] · N=25
Average field size
5.12
participants[] · N=25
Largest field
7 tools
participants[] · N=1
Median winner score
85.2
ranking[0].overall · N=25
All 25 aggregate fields
ranking, winner and gap as recorded in each dossier
| # | Dossier | Category | Field | Leader (overall) | Runner-up (overall) | Gap (pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | voice agent tts stacks | Audio & Voice | 6 | PlayHT · 89.2 | ElevenLabs · 87.8 | 1.4 |
| 2 | best free ai image generators | Design | 7 | Canva · 87.1 | Leonardo AI · 83.2 | 3.9 |
| 3 | enterprise ai assistants | Workflow Automation | 4 | Notion AI · 86.7 | Microsoft 365 Copilot · 80.8 | 5.9 |
| 4 | free ai coding agents compared | Coding | 6 | Aider · 86 | Trae · 84.2 | 1.8 |
| 5 | enterprise coding assistants compared | Coding | 5 | GitHub Copilot · 88.1 | Tabnine · 82.5 | 5.6 |
| 6 | self hosted coding agents compared | Coding | 5 | Cline · 83.7 | Tabby · 82.6 | 1.1 |
| 7 | terminal coding agents compared | Coding | 5 | Claude Code · 86.1 | Aider · 86 | 0.1 |
| 8 | academic research tools compared | Research | 6 | Semantic Scholar · 87.5 | OpenAlex · 87 | 0.5 |
| 9 | ai answer engines compared | Research | 6 | ChatGPT · 90.9 | Claude · 88.9 | 2 |
| 10 | deep research agents compared | Research | 5 | ChatGPT · 90.9 | Gemini · 88.5 | 2.4 |
| 11 | ai writing platforms compared | Writing | 5 | Writesonic · 81.1 | Surfer SEO · 79.8 | 1.3 |
| 12 | ai grammar and paraphrase tools compared | Writing | 5 | QuillBot · 85.2 | Grammarly · 83.1 | 2.1 |
| 13 | ai video editing tools compared | Video | 5 | Descript · 82.2 | Kapwing · 80.1 | 2.1 |
| 14 | cheapest ai video generators compared | Video | 5 | Kling AI · 82.7 | Hailuo AI · 80.6 | 2.1 |
| 15 | long to short video tools compared | Video | 5 | OpusClip · 83.2 | Vizard · 76.2 | 7 |
| 16 | ai voice cloning compared | Audio & Voice | 5 | PlayHT · 89.2 | ElevenLabs · 87.8 | 1.4 |
| 17 | ai music generation compared | Audio & Voice | 5 | Udio · 82.4 | Suno · 82 | 0.4 |
| 18 | speech to text apis compared | Audio & Voice | 4 | Deepgram · 85.1 | AssemblyAI · 84.5 | 0.6 |
| 19 | podcast production tools compared | Audio & Voice | 5 | Adobe Podcast · 85.6 | Cleanvoice · 77.5 | 8.1 |
| 20 | image upscaling tools compared | Design | 5 | Krea AI · 83.1 | Topaz Photo AI · 79.9 | 3.2 |
| 21 | design to code tools compared | Design | 5 | v0 · 83.5 | Figma Make · 82.3 | 1.2 |
| 22 | no code app builders compared | App Builders | 5 | Bubble AI · 80.6 | Glide AI · 79.4 | 1.2 |
| 23 | workflow automation platforms compared | Workflow Automation | 5 | n8n · 84.8 | Make · 84.7 | 0.1 |
| 24 | meeting notetakers compared | Workflow Automation | 5 | Fathom · 86.1 | Fireflies.ai · 83.8 | 2.3 |
| 25 | sales email assistants compared | Workflow Automation | 4 | Superhuman · 79.9 | Bardeen · 77.5 | 2.4 |
Field size distribution
Number of aggregate dossiers by participant count.
Method
- Source: data/comparisons.json, dossiers with mode=aggregate (N=25).
- Field size = participants[].length; leader and runner-up = ranking[0] and ranking[1] with their recorded overall values.
- Gap = the dossier's published delta (points between leader and runner-up).
- Archive-recorded only: rankings are quoted as published; no scores are recomputed here.