Design & Image: Weakest Dimension (2026)
Each Design & Image tool's lowest recorded dimension among the five rubric axes, plus how often each dimension lands at the bottom across the channel (55 tools). Ties are resolved to the earlier rubric axis (quality → features → usability → performance → value) and disclosed here.
Weakest-Dimension Census
Number of tools whose minimum recorded dimension falls on each axis.
Per-Tool Weakest Dimension (Recorded)
| Tool | Weakest dimension | Value | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| FLUX | Usability | 87 | 88.3 |
| Canva | Performance | 84 | 87.1 |
| Nano Banana | Feature Depth | 80 | 83.4 |
| Leonardo AI | Value for Money | 80 | 83.2 |
| Krea AI | Value for Money | 78 | 83.1 |
| Recraft | Value for Money | 78 | 82.9 |
| Adobe Firefly | Value for Money | 74 | 82.8 |
| Ideogram | Feature Depth | 78 | 82.4 |
| Figma Make | Value for Money | 74 | 82.3 |
| Clipdrop | Feature Depth | 78 | 82.1 |
| Freepik AI Suite | Performance | 78 | 81.9 |
| PhotoRoom | Feature Depth | 76 | 81.9 |
| GPT Image | Value for Money | 76 | 81.0 |
| Remove.bg | Feature Depth | 74 | 80.9 |
| Pixlr | Output Quality | 78 | 80.8 |
| Fotor | Output Quality | 78 | 80.5 |
| Playground AI | Feature Depth | 78 | 80.5 |
| Kittl | Value for Money | 74 | 80.3 |
| Image Creator | Feature Depth | 62 | 80.2 |
| Topaz Photo AI | Value for Money | 64 | 79.9 |
| Uizard | Feature Depth | 76 | 79.5 |
| Looka | Feature Depth | 76 | 79.2 |
| Qwen-Image | Usability | 66 | 79.1 |
| ComfyUI | Usability | 70 | 78.9 |
| Seedream | Usability | 74 | 78.7 |
| Flair AI | Feature Depth | 76 | 78.6 |
| Upscayl | Feature Depth | 70 | 78.6 |
| Kolors | Usability | 66 | 78.4 |
| Coolors | Output Quality | 72 | 78.2 |
| Imagen | Feature Depth | 74 | 78.2 |
| PicWish | Feature Depth | 74 | 78.1 |
| Vectorizer.AI | Feature Depth | 72 | 78.1 |
| NightCafe | Value for Money | 76 | 77.9 |
| Khroma | Feature Depth | 66 | 77.5 |
| Magnific AI | Value for Money | 62 | 77.4 |
| HunyuanImage | Usability | 62 | 77.2 |
| Microsoft Designer | Feature Depth | 74 | 76.9 |
| Pebblely | Feature Depth | 74 | 76.9 |
| Civitai | Output Quality | 74 | 76.3 |
| Getimg.ai | Output Quality | 76 | 76.3 |
| Tensor.Art | Output Quality | 74 | 76.3 |
| Beautiful.ai | Value for Money | 72 | 76.1 |
| Brandmark | Feature Depth | 72 | 75.8 |
| Picsart | Value for Money | 72 | 75.7 |
| Pixelcut | Output Quality | 74 | 75.7 |
| DreamStudio (Brand Studio) | Value for Money | 72 | 75.5 |
| VanceAI | Output Quality | 74 | 75.4 |
| BlueWillow | Output Quality | 70 | 75.2 |
| Hotpot.ai | Value for Money | 70 | 74.9 |
| Cleanup.pictures | Feature Depth | 70 | 74.8 |
| SnapEdit | Output Quality | 72 | 74.8 |
| Artbreeder | Feature Depth | 72 | 74.6 |
| OpenArt | Output Quality | 72 | 74.2 |
| Fontjoy | Feature Depth | 62 | 73.7 |
| LogoAI | Output Quality | 72 | 73.4 |
Methodology — all figures are computed on this page from the published archives only (data/tools, 55 recorded design tools, snapshots 2026-09-06 – 2026-09-17). Medians use the standard median (middle element, or the mean of the two middle elements rounded to one decimal); means are arithmetic averages rounded to one decimal. A low dimension marks a recorded rubric minimum, not a product defect. No figure on this page is sampled, estimated or sponsored.