AiRecMark/Comparisons/Dyad vs Supabase AI

HASH: 0x5931...72af • SNAPSHOT: 2026-09-17 • CORPUS: APP BUILDERS CATEGORY • DIMS V2-5DIM verified SCORING RUBRIC v2

EMPIRICAL BENCHMARK DOSSIER N=2 ARCHIVED TOOLS • 5 DIMENSIONS

Dyad vs Supabase AI: prompt-to-app velocity vs full-code control compared

Dyad (free, local-first, open source AI app builder for your desktop) and Supabase AI (postgres platform with an integrated AI assistant and pgvector) go head-to-head across AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index — quality, features, usability, performance and value — with every score drawn from published tool archives as of 2026-09-17. Which app builders tool should teams standardize on?

workspace_premium AiRecMark Verified Winner

Supabase AI Wins by +1.8 Overall Points

Supabase AI (82.8/100) leads the Airecmark five-dimension composite, taking Output Quality, Feature Depth, Performance. Dyad (81.0/100) stays ahead on Usability, Value for Money. Dyad entry pricing is roughly 20% lower ($20/mo).

Delta: +1.8 Composite Score Dyad Usability Lead: +2 pts

Dyad 81.0

Output Quality80

Feature Depth78

Usability

Performance78

Value for Money

Inspect Dyad →

Supabase AI 82.8

Output Quality

Feature Depth

Usability82

Performance

Value for Money82

Inspect Supabase AI →

Archive vectors

5-Axis Differential Engine Performance

Dyad

Supabase AI

Feature Depth

Supabase AI takes Feature Depth by 6.0 points (84 vs 78) on AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index.

SUPABASE AI (84)84 / 100

DYAD (78)78 / 100

Performance

Supabase AI takes Performance by 6.0 points (84 vs 78) on AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index.

SUPABASE AI (84)84 / 100

DYAD (78)78 / 100

Value for Money +4.0 pt Lead

Dyad takes Value for Money by 4.0 points (86 vs 82) on AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index.

DYAD (86)86 / 100

SUPABASE AI (82)82 / 100

Scenario Architecture

Choose Your App Builders Tool by Working Style

Both tools sit near the top of the app builders category, but their dimension profiles and pricing models produce clearly distinct working styles.

terminal

Standardize on Dyad if...

Optimized for: Privacy-Minded Builders Who Own Their Code

check_circle Leads Usability (84 vs 82): a 2-point edge on the deterministic index.
check_circle Runs locally with no vendor lock-in: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Supabase AI.
check_circle Works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Supabase AI.
check_circle One-click Supabase/Neon and GitHub/Vercel: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Supabase AI.

SUBSCRIPTION TIER

Try Dyad arrow_forward freemium • from $20/mo • Dyad

speed

Standardize on Supabase AI if...

Optimized for: Full-Stack Postgres Backends

check_circle Composite lead (82.8/100): tops the Airecmark index against Dyad (81.0/100) on the archive-recorded five-dimension composite.
check_circle Leads Output Quality (82 vs 80): a 2-point edge on the deterministic index.
check_circle AI assistant writes SQL, schemas and RLS policies: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Dyad.
check_circle Pgvector toolkit for AI apps built in: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Dyad.

SUBSCRIPTION TIER $25 / mo

Try Supabase AI arrow_forward freemium • from $25/mo • Supabase

Empirical Breakdown

5-Axis Benchmark Deep Dive

Dimension scores are drawn from the AiRecMark tool archives (V2-5DIM, as of 2026-09-17) on a 0-100 scale; per-axis winner calls use the higher dimension score with deterministic tie handling.

AXIS 01

Output Quality

Accuracy, depth and reliability of primary outputs

DYAD: 8 / 10 SUPABASE AI: 8.2 / 10

Dyad — Output Quality

Dyad posts 80 / 100 on Output Quality. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

Supabase AI — Output Quality

Supabase AI posts 82 / 100 on Output Quality. The audit highlights aI assistant writes SQL, schemas and RLS policies and pgvector toolkit for AI apps built in as its signature strengths.

AXIS 02

Feature Depth

Breadth, maturity and extensibility of the capability set

DYAD: 7.8 / 10 SUPABASE AI: 8.4 / 10

Dyad — Feature Depth

Dyad posts 78 / 100 on Feature Depth. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

Supabase AI — Feature Depth

Supabase AI posts 84 / 100 on Feature Depth. The audit highlights aI assistant writes SQL, schemas and RLS policies and pgvector toolkit for AI apps built in as its signature strengths.

AXIS 03

Usability

Onboarding, interface clarity and daily ergonomics

DYAD: 8.4 / 10 SUPABASE AI: 8.2 / 10

Dyad — Usability

Dyad posts 84 / 100 on Usability. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

Supabase AI — Usability

Supabase AI posts 82 / 100 on Usability. The audit highlights aI assistant writes SQL, schemas and RLS policies and pgvector toolkit for AI apps built in as its signature strengths.

AXIS 04

Performance

Speed, stability and consistency under production load

DYAD: 7.8 / 10 SUPABASE AI: 8.4 / 10

Dyad — Performance

Dyad posts 78 / 100 on Performance. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

Supabase AI — Performance

Supabase AI posts 84 / 100 on Performance. The audit highlights aI assistant writes SQL, schemas and RLS policies and pgvector toolkit for AI apps built in as its signature strengths.

AXIS 05

Value for Money

Pricing fairness relative to delivered capability

DYAD: 8.6 / 10 SUPABASE AI: 8.2 / 10

Dyad — Value for Money

Dyad posts 86 / 100 on Value for Money. Published entry pricing: Free (BYO API key) · Pro $20/mo (200 credits) · Max $79/mo (900 credits).

Supabase AI — Value for Money

Supabase AI posts 82 / 100 on Value for Money. Published entry pricing: Free (50K MAU) · Pro from $25/mo · Team from $599/mo · Enterprise custom · AI Assistant on all plans.

Feature-by-Feature Matrix

Exhaustive Technical Specification Diff

COMPLIANCE: AIRECMARK EVALUATION PROTOCOL V2.4

Capability / Specification	Dyad ($20/mo)	Supabase AI ($25/mo)	Deterministic Winner
Overall AirecMark Score Composite of the five recorded dimensions	81.0 / 100	82.8 / 100	Supabase AI (Composite lead)
Output Quality Accuracy, depth and reliability of primary outputs	80 / 100	82 / 100	Supabase AI (+2 pts)
Feature Depth Breadth, maturity and extensibility of the capability set	78 / 100	84 / 100	Supabase AI (+6 pts)
Usability Onboarding, interface clarity and daily ergonomics	84 / 100	82 / 100	Dyad (+2 pts)
Performance Speed, stability and consistency under production load	78 / 100	84 / 100	Supabase AI (+6 pts)
Value for Money Pricing fairness relative to delivered capability	86 / 100	82 / 100	Dyad (+4 pts)
Starting Price Published entry pricing (USD)	Free (BYO API key) · Pro $20/mo (200 credits) · Max $79/mo (900 credits)	Free (50K MAU) · Pro from $25/mo · Team from $599/mo · Enterprise custom · AI Assistant on all plans	Dyad (Lower entry price)
Best For Documented target audience	Privacy-Minded Builders Who Own Their Code	Full-Stack Postgres Backends	Tie (Use-case dependent)

Engineering Operations

Migration Playbook: Switching Without Friction

Swapping a daily driver mid-project is costly. Follow this three-step checklist to evaluate Dyad and Supabase AI on equal terms before standardizing your team.

01

Export Config, Prompts & Data

Inventory what each candidate needs: prompt libraries, templates, connected accounts and project files. Export from your current stack first so Dyad and Supabase AI start from the same baseline.

SETUP: SAME BASELINE

02

Map Pricing to Your Real Usage

Compare published entry tiers against your expected volume. Dyad starts at $20/mo (freemium); Supabase AI starts at $25/mo (freemium) — model the monthly cost at your actual workload before committing.

ECONOMICS: PUBLISHED TIERS

03

Run a Two-Week Parallel Trial

Run both tools on the same live tasks for ten working days. Score outputs against the five Airecmark dimensions, then let the 1.8-point composite gap — not vendor marketing — decide the standardization call.

balance

Deterministic Evaluation Methodology & Integrity Standard

AiRecMark evaluates every tool against its deterministic five-dimension index (Quality, Features, Usability, Performance, Value) using official documentation, published pricing pages and the published five-dimension rubric. All scores, deltas and winner calls in this dossier are drawn from the published tool archives as of 2026-09-17 and can be traced back to the public tool profiles.

Affiliate Blind Trust Policy: Any referral commissions or partner links generated through AiRecMark are routed into a blind trust utilized exclusively to fund bare-metal compute benchmarks. Zero sponsored placement or ranking distortion is permitted under any circumstances.

BENCHMARK ENGINE: AIRECMARK-DETERMINISTIC-V2.4 • SOURCE: DATA/TOOLS/*.JSON

Archive record