AiRecMark/Comparisons/Bolt.new vs Dyad
HASH: 0x191f...0084 SNAPSHOT: 2026-09-17 CORPUS: APP BUILDERS CATEGORY • DIMS V2-5DIM
EMPIRICAL BENCHMARK DOSSIER N=2 ARCHIVED TOOLS • 5 DIMENSIONS

Bolt.new vs Dyad: prompt-to-app velocity vs full-code control compared

Bolt.new (full-stack development in the browser via WebContainers) and Dyad (free, local-first, open source AI app builder for your desktop) go head-to-head across AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index — quality, features, usability, performance and value — with every score drawn from published tool archives as of 2026-09-17. Which app builders tool should teams standardize on?

workspace_premium AiRecMark Verified Winner

Dyad Wins by +0.2 Overall Points

Dyad (81.0/100) leads the Airecmark five-dimension composite, taking Value for Money. Bolt.new (80.8/100) stays ahead on Output Quality, Feature Depth, Usability, Performance. Dyad entry pricing is roughly 20% lower ($20/mo).

Delta: +0.2 Composite Score Dyad Value for Money Lead: +9 pts Bolt.new Output Quality Lead: +1 pts
Bolt.new 80.8
Output Quality81
Feature Depth82
Usability86
Performance79
Value for Money77
Inspect Bolt.new →
Dyad 81.0
Output Quality80
Feature Depth78
Usability84
Performance78
Value for Money86
Inspect Dyad →
Archive vectors

5-Axis Differential Engine Performance

Bolt.new
Dyad
Value for Money +9.0 pt Lead

Dyad takes Value for Money by 9.0 points (86 vs 77) on AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index.

DYAD (86)86 / 100
BOLT.NEW (77)77 / 100
Feature Depth +4.0 pt Lead

Bolt.new takes Feature Depth by 4.0 points (82 vs 78) on AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index.

BOLT.NEW (82)82 / 100
DYAD (78)78 / 100
Usability +2.0 pt Lead

Bolt.new takes Usability by 2.0 points (86 vs 84) on AiRecMark's deterministic five-dimension index.

BOLT.NEW (86)86 / 100
DYAD (84)84 / 100
Scenario Architecture

Choose Your App Builders Tool by Working Style

Both tools sit near the top of the app builders category, but their dimension profiles and pricing models produce clearly distinct working styles.

terminal

Standardize on Bolt.new if...

Optimized for: Developers prototyping web apps entirely in the browser
  • check_circle Leads Output Quality (81 vs 80): a 1-point edge on the deterministic index.
  • check_circle Zero local setup — full dev loop in the browser: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Dyad.
  • check_circle Token model is transparent (1M free / 10M Pro): cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Dyad.
  • check_circle Strongest axis — Usability (86/100): its top recorded dimension, optimized for developers prototyping web apps entirely in the browser.
SUBSCRIPTION TIER $25 / mo
Try Bolt.new arrow_forward freemium • from $25/mo • StackBlitz
speed

Standardize on Dyad if...

Optimized for: Privacy-Minded Builders Who Own Their Code
  • check_circle Composite lead (81.0/100): tops the Airecmark index against Bolt.new (80.8/100) on the archive-recorded five-dimension composite.
  • check_circle Leads Value for Money (86 vs 77): a 9-point edge on the deterministic index.
  • check_circle Runs locally with no vendor lock-in: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Bolt.new.
  • check_circle Works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models: cited in the Airecmark editorial assessment as a differentiator versus Bolt.new.
SUBSCRIPTION TIER $20 / mo
Try Dyad arrow_forward freemium • from $20/mo • Dyad
Empirical Breakdown

5-Axis Benchmark Deep Dive

Dimension scores are drawn from the AiRecMark tool archives (V2-5DIM, as of 2026-09-17) on a 0-100 scale; per-axis winner calls use the higher dimension score with deterministic tie handling.

AXIS 01

Output Quality

Accuracy, depth and reliability of primary outputs
BOLT.NEW: 8.1 / 10 DYAD: 8 / 10 WINNER: BOLT.NEW
Bolt.new — Output Quality

Bolt.new posts 81 / 100 on Output Quality. The audit highlights zero local setup — full dev loop in the browser and token model is transparent (1M free / 10M Pro) as its signature strengths.

Dyad — Output Quality

Dyad posts 80 / 100 on Output Quality. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

AXIS 02

Feature Depth

Breadth, maturity and extensibility of the capability set
BOLT.NEW: 8.2 / 10 DYAD: 7.8 / 10 WINNER: BOLT.NEW
Bolt.new — Feature Depth

Bolt.new posts 82 / 100 on Feature Depth. The audit highlights zero local setup — full dev loop in the browser and token model is transparent (1M free / 10M Pro) as its signature strengths.

Dyad — Feature Depth

Dyad posts 78 / 100 on Feature Depth. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

AXIS 03

Usability

Onboarding, interface clarity and daily ergonomics
BOLT.NEW: 8.6 / 10 DYAD: 8.4 / 10 WINNER: BOLT.NEW
Bolt.new — Usability

Bolt.new posts 86 / 100 on Usability. The audit highlights zero local setup — full dev loop in the browser and token model is transparent (1M free / 10M Pro) as its signature strengths.

Dyad — Usability

Dyad posts 84 / 100 on Usability. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

AXIS 04

Performance

Speed, stability and consistency under production load
BOLT.NEW: 7.9 / 10 DYAD: 7.8 / 10 WINNER: BOLT.NEW
Bolt.new — Performance

Bolt.new posts 79 / 100 on Performance. The audit highlights zero local setup — full dev loop in the browser and token model is transparent (1M free / 10M Pro) as its signature strengths.

Dyad — Performance

Dyad posts 78 / 100 on Performance. The audit highlights runs locally with no vendor lock-in and works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Ollama and local models as its signature strengths.

AXIS 05

Value for Money

Pricing fairness relative to delivered capability
BOLT.NEW: 7.7 / 10 DYAD: 8.6 / 10 WINNER: DYAD
Bolt.new — Value for Money

Bolt.new posts 77 / 100 on Value for Money. Published entry pricing: Pro $25 / mo (10M tokens) · Free 1M tokens.

Dyad — Value for Money

Dyad posts 86 / 100 on Value for Money. Published entry pricing: Free (BYO API key) · Pro $20/mo (200 credits) · Max $79/mo (900 credits).

Feature-by-Feature Matrix

Exhaustive Technical Specification Diff

COMPLIANCE: AIRECMARK EVALUATION PROTOCOL V2.4
Capability / Specification Bolt.new ($25/mo) Dyad ($20/mo) Deterministic Winner
Overall AirecMark Score
Composite of the five recorded dimensions
80.8 / 100 81.0 / 100 Dyad (Composite lead)
Output Quality
Accuracy, depth and reliability of primary outputs
81 / 100 80 / 100 Bolt.new (+1 pts)
Feature Depth
Breadth, maturity and extensibility of the capability set
82 / 100 78 / 100 Bolt.new (+4 pts)
Usability
Onboarding, interface clarity and daily ergonomics
86 / 100 84 / 100 Bolt.new (+2 pts)
Performance
Speed, stability and consistency under production load
79 / 100 78 / 100 Bolt.new (+1 pts)
Value for Money
Pricing fairness relative to delivered capability
77 / 100 86 / 100 Dyad (+9 pts)
Starting Price
Published entry pricing (USD)
Pro $25 / mo (10M tokens) · Free 1M tokens Free (BYO API key) · Pro $20/mo (200 credits) · Max $79/mo (900 credits) Dyad (Lower entry price)
Best For
Documented target audience
Developers prototyping web apps entirely in the browser Privacy-Minded Builders Who Own Their Code Tie (Use-case dependent)
Engineering Operations

Migration Playbook: Switching Without Friction

Swapping a daily driver mid-project is costly. Follow this three-step checklist to evaluate Bolt.new and Dyad on equal terms before standardizing your team.

01

Export Config, Prompts & Data

Inventory what each candidate needs: prompt libraries, templates, connected accounts and project files. Export from your current stack first so Bolt.new and Dyad start from the same baseline.

SETUP: SAME BASELINE
02

Map Pricing to Your Real Usage

Compare published entry tiers against your expected volume. Bolt.new starts at $25/mo (freemium); Dyad starts at $20/mo (freemium) — model the monthly cost at your actual workload before committing.

ECONOMICS: PUBLISHED TIERS
03

Run a Two-Week Parallel Trial

Run both tools on the same live tasks for ten working days. Score outputs against the five Airecmark dimensions, then let the 0.2-point composite gap — not vendor marketing — decide the standardization call.

balance

Deterministic Evaluation Methodology & Integrity Standard

AiRecMark evaluates every tool against its deterministic five-dimension index (Quality, Features, Usability, Performance, Value) using official documentation, published pricing pages and the published five-dimension rubric. All scores, deltas and winner calls in this dossier are drawn from the published tool archives as of 2026-09-17 and can be traced back to the public tool profiles.

Affiliate Blind Trust Policy: Any referral commissions or partner links generated through AiRecMark are routed into a blind trust utilized exclusively to fund bare-metal compute benchmarks. Zero sponsored placement or ranking distortion is permitted under any circumstances.

BENCHMARK ENGINE: AIRECMARK-DETERMINISTIC-V2.4 SOURCE: DATA/TOOLS/*.JSON
VERDICT SUMMARY