INDEX
/
AI_RESEARCH
/
ANSWERTHIS
v2026.9
PROVED: 0xpricing checked 2026-09-15
dns
archive:data/tools
|
|
LATENCY: Performance 82/100
Cited Q&A
Systematic review
FREEMIUM PRICING
Verified Audit
AnswerThis
/ CITEDANSWER RESEARCH WORKFLOWS
business
AnswerThis
•
verified
Verified Research Audit
Paper Q&A and systematic-review assistant over 250M+ papers
Composite Index Rating
CLASS: B-TIER
80.8/100
Rank #32 in Research & Retrieval
trending_up
Snapshot 2026-09-15
30d Velocity
Benchmark Confidence:
v2-5dim rubric
Recorded features:
4 recorded features
Primary Engine:
AI Writer
Citation Precision
link
84.0%
Answer grounding against retrieved sources (5-dim quality).
check_circle
84.0% rubric quality
Research Automation
hub
82/100
Depth of autonomous multi-source investigation capabilities.
Avg Depth: 4 recorded features
Runtime Performance
speed
82/100
Runtime performance & latency dimension (v2-5dim rubric).
bolt
Rubric v2-5dim
Onboarding Usability
format_image_left
84.0%
Workflow ergonomics from the v2-5dim rubric.
verified
Usability dimension
Recorded Score Vectors
Archive snapshots refreshed on each data update cycle.
menu_book
Output Quality & Reliability
84.0%
correctness and consistency of primary task output.
v2-5dim
shuffle
Feature Depth & Integrations
82.0%
breadth of integrations, APIs, and advanced capabilities.
v2-5dim
fact_check
Onboarding & Usability
84.0%
onboarding friction, UI clarity, and workflow ergonomics.
v2-5dim
attachment
Runtime Performance & Latency
82.0%
latency, throughput, and stability under load.
v2-5dim
psychology
Price-to-Value Efficiency
72.0%
capability delivered per pricing tier dollar.
v2-5dim
30-Day Evaluation Quality & Consistency Index
Precision
Baseline
Day -30 (baseline audit)
Day -15 (audit refresh)
Today (80.8 Composite)
Engine Architecture
Technical primitives powering the AnswerThis pipeline.
01
Cited Q&A
Answers grounded in paper libraries.
Source: AnswerThis · 2026-09-15
02
Systematic review
PRISMA-style screening automation.
Source: AnswerThis · 2026-09-15
03
AI Writer
Manuscript drafting from reviews.
Source: AnswerThis · 2026-09-15
04
Exports
Zotero/Mendeley/EndNote support.
Source: AnswerThis · 2026-09-15
tune
Head-to-Head Comparison
Direct Peer Evaluation Matrix
Updated: Per-audit refresh
| Engine / Platform | AiRecMark Score | Retrieval Paradigm | Deep Research Mode | Model Agility | Hallucination Delta | Pricing / Seat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A
AnswerThis
Target
|
● 80.8 | Paper Q&A and systematic-review assistant ov | check_circle Agentic research mode | AnswerThis | -—% vs raw LLM | $35/user |
|
C
Claude
|
96.1 | Adaptive Reasoning Engine | check_circle Guided research mode | Managed models | -—% vs raw LLM | — |
|
P
Perplexity
|
93.6 | Multi-Turn Source Grounding | remove Guided research mode | Managed models | -—% vs raw LLM | $20/mo Pro |
|
C
ChatGPT
|
90.9 | General Reasoning | check_circle Guided research mode | Managed models | -—% vs raw LLM | $20/mo |
|
G
Gemini
|
88.5 | Users embedded in Google's ecosystem who wan | remove Guided research mode | Managed models | -—% vs raw LLM | $19.99/mo |
Metrics aggregated from published archive fields.
Five-dimension rubric v2 (25/20/15/20/20 weighting).
Financial & Token Econometrics
Subscription & API Tiers
Verified plan specifications and monthly throughput allowances.
Standard Consumer
Free
$0
forever
- check Cited Q&A
- check Systematic review
- check AI Writer
- close Pro seat price mid-pack
- close Institutional Max at $250/mo is niche
Best Value for Technical Teams
Engineering Tier
Pro
$35
/ user
- check Cited Q&A
- check Systematic review
- check AI Writer
Sovereign Deployment
Enterprise
Custom
SLA terms
- check SSO / SAML & audit controls
- check Dedicated support channel
- check Custom quota & SLA
- close Pro seat price mid-pack
- close Institutional Max at $250/mo is niche
verified_user
AiRecMark Lead Analyst Assessment
"AnswerThis stands out for cited answers and summaries from 250M+ papers. Paper Q&A and systematic-review assistant over 250M+ papers anchors its proposition, and AiRecMark's five-dimension audit lands it at 80.8/100 — a pragmatic default for cited-Answer Research Workflows."
EVALUATION SIGN-OFF:
SIGNER: AiRecMark Editorial · 2026-09-15 (AIRECMARK-DAO)
check_circle
Empirical Advantages
warning
Documented Technical Trade-offs
lock_reset
Pricing Source Verification
sha256: 2026-09-15